Chapter 15Human Greatness · Greatness
Book 13. Part Five: Questions of Spiritual and Occult Knowledge · Section Two: The Avatar and the Vibhuti
Those who were with Krishna were in all appearance men like other men. They spoke and acted with each other as men with men and were not thought of by those around them as gods. Krishna himself was known by most as a man — only a few worshipped him as the Divine.
* Yuge yuge3 may be used in a general sense, as in English “from age to age” and not refer technically to the yuga proper according to the Puranic computation. But the bah¯uni has an air of referring to very numerous lives especially when coupled with tava ca. In that case all these many births could not be full incar-nations, — many may have been merely Vibhuti births carrying on the thread from incarnation to incarnation. About Arjuna’s accompanying him in each and every birth, nothing is said, but it would not be likely — many, of course.
He [Buddha] affirmed practically something unknowable that was Permanent and Unmanifested. Adwaita does the same. Buddha never said he was an Avatar of a Personal God but that he was the Buddha. It is the Hindus who made him an Avatar. If Buddha had looked upon himself as an Avatar at all, it would have been as an Avatar of the impersonal Truth.
* If a Divine Consciousness and Force descended and through the personality we call Buddha did a great work for the world, then Buddha can be called an Avatar — the tapasya and arriving at knowledge are only an incident of the manifestation.
If on the other hand Buddha was only a human being like many others who arrived at some knowledge and preached it, 3 In the Gita, Krishna tells Arjuna, “Many are my lives that are past” (4.5) and again, “I am born from age to age.” (4.8) The correspondent asked how Krishna’s past lives could be many (bah¯uni) if he was born only from age to age (yuge yuge). — Ed.